The suggestible amendments in The Hindu Marriage Act 1955

Submitted by asandil on Tue, 05/27/2014 - 18:52

According to the senior lawyer of the Supreme Court Kamini Jaiswal, it can, as of now, take 6 months to 20 years to get a divorce. As stated by the previous Union Law Minister M. Veerappa Moily, there are 55,000 cases pending in the different courts across the nation. Mr. Veerappa Moily likewise precluded correcting the Hindu Marriage Act so as to oblige the Khap Panchayat's requests.

 The Khap Panchayats have been requesting a boycott on relational unions inside the same ""gotra"" or sub rank and needed the Hindu Marriage Act to be altered appropriately. The amendments are mainly based on the recommendations of the Law Commission, for the first time in April, 1978 and second time in March 2009, in line with a bunch of judgments delivered by the Supreme Court.

 Actually, the apex court had directed to the Central government in the year 2006 stating that it should include irretrievable breakdown as a criterion for divorce between the parties'. Countless divorces cases have been settled by the courts where the marriage was completely broken and there was no hope of reconciliation, but the courts by applying the technicalities of the law, subsisted the relation and could not give any relief to the parties.

In the current circumstances, the legal machinery has been receiving a more tolerant and reasonable methodology and a few judgments of distinctive courts affirm the way that they probably won't adhere to the standard idea of constancy of the marriage hitch.

It is seen that in the circumstances where the courts are slanted to receive a liberal or commonsense methodology, the marriage between the parties would not be disintegrated just on the suggestions made by one of the parties that the marriage has broken down, however on the way that no significant reason would be served by keeping it alive.

The court may take a comprehensive methodology of the actualities and circumstances of each one case, likewise where a party is in a profitable position for his or her mistake, and after that tries to argue the breakdown of marriage, the court would not conjure its purview to disintegrate the marriage on this ground.

The logic behind it is that in such a situation where there is definitely no chance of compromising and living again together or when the marital ties are severed beyond any repair, it would really be beyond any reasoning to keep the relationship alive. Here the ground of irretrievable breakdown is vital. But the amendment, when introduced, needs to provide safeguards to ensure that no party is exploited.

If you need any further information or clarification in this regard, please feel free to contact us or post your queries on our website where one of our exclusively appointed legal experts will help you more: